14 Temmuz 2014 Pazartesi

Early Islamic Architecture



What is Islamic Art? What is Islamic Architecture? Did the early-Islamic structures have a novel form or were they derived from previous cultures? Were early-Islamic mosques built in order to gather the Muslim society or were they built with an aesthetic sense? These are the questions Oleg Grabar answers in the “Islamic Religious Art: The Mosque” section of his famous book called “The Formation of Islamic Art”. In order to understand the common features used in the latter mosques, he mainly focuses on the structures of Umayyad mosques such as the Great Mosque of Cordoba in Spain (fig. 1.a and 1.b) and the Great Mosque of Damascus in Syria (fig. 2), also Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem (fig. 3) and the Prophet’s house in Madinah.
            He first analyzes the word ‘masjid’ using its appearances in the Quran to understand the origin of the mosques and reaches the conclusion that it only means “sanctuary, a place to worship” which is far too general to refer only to the Islamic mosques. The need of an architectural structure, mosque, emerged from a statement in Quran, which requires a gathering in Fridays to perform prayers. Allowing the Muslims to pray anywhere and on their own for the rest of the time, Quran emphasizes the Friday noons with these words in 62nd surat and 9th verse, “O you have believed, when (the adhan) is called for prayer on the day of Jumu’ah (Friday), then proceed to the remembrance of Allah and leave trade. That is better for you, if you only knew.” The only place for this gathering was the Prophet’s house, which really was his home at first and then transformed into a holy mosque. Besides the house, other small formations were created around Medina and they were called “musallah”. Unfortunately, none of these early structures had survived.
            Since there were no existing mosques earlier than the 8th century, he examines the early Umayyad mosques: The Great Mosque of Damascus and Cordoba assuming that especially the features they both share may be considered as the characteristics of the spaces that were used in mosques in earlier centuries. The common characteristics of the nonexistent early are:
·         Large rectangular shaped plan
·         Large courtyards
·         Surrounded by porticoes on three sides
·         Large halls with naves on the fourth side 
He tries to explain the reason why the plan of a mosque had changed between the Early Islamic period and the future centuries from a simple rectangular form to a much more complex structure. It is for sure that the masjids were embracing the whole Muslim society in the city since the beginning of the Early Islamic period. The growing population led to a development in the plan of the mosques. It was once a single rectangular unit consisted of an open and a closed area (fig. 4), then developed into two parts: a courtyard and a closed area with a façade. This implies that mosques were built to meet social needs rather than architectural or aesthetic conceptions.
While examining the early structures, Grabar highlights the differences of the hypostyle hall for a mosque that is distinguished from the hall in a church. In a church, the hall is wider than the side aisles and the naves are parallel to each other. On the other hand, the size of the hall does not vary in a mosque and the direction of the naves is perpendicular (fig. 5). He suggests that the early hypostyle hall was inspired by the house of the Prophet instead of the halls in a church. He also points out that the columns are reused in the construction of the mosques such as the mosque of Damascus from Christian churches. So, we understand that it is also very natural to use the existing art forms when trying to formulate an artistic voice for a new formation. According to Grabar there are five distinguished features of Islamic architecture:
1.      Minaret
2.      Mihrab
3.      Maqsurah
4.      Domed unit in the court
5.      Axial nave ends up in kiblah
These features are explained in the article in thoroughly. The one that I found most interesting was the “minaret”. It is the part where the Muslims are called for prayer. He mentions the two different types of minaret: In the first one, it is attached to the mosque and has a rectangular shape (fig. 6). The other one is located apart from the mosque and has a cylindrical shape. This kind of a minaret exists in the Great Mosque of Samarra (fig. 7). The most interesting part is where he states that the calling for prayer has always been a need since the rise of Islam whereas the usage of the first minaret is seen in the Great Mosque of Damascus (fig. 8). The towers of Damascus from early Christians were convenient for this task. In conclusion Grabar states that, “It is thus fairly simple to conclude that a certain function appeared fairly early in Islamic mosques and that the forms used for it were taken from older architectural vocabularies and therefore varied from area to area.” And he believes that a structure keeps it originality when it is reused for another function. So, the society puts a totally new meaning to an old tower.
After explaining the minaret feature of the mosque, I would like continue with the developments in the mosque structure. The single form of the mosque varied only with the growth of different branches and sects of Islam, which had varied needs that could have been satisfied with differing architectural forms. These may have involved various religious symbolisms and at times mystical interpretations:
1-       Typical mosque buildings
2-      Islamic function acquired monumental form such as madrasa, mausoleum, tomb or ribat
            Grabar tries to determine which structural elements of the early mosques are specifically Islamic and are not remainings of a pre-existing tradition. While doing that, he describes the various decorative ornamentation techniques found in a wide variety of examples of mosques from a huge geographical area. In conclusion, he touches upon a significant question in Islamic art. Was the decoration just for ornamentation or did it have an essential meaning? For the decoration of the mosques, he suggests two variations:
1-      Concentrating the decorative elements around the sections of the mosque to focus attention to these parts. (nave or mihrab (fig. 9))
2-      Distributing the decorative elements to emphasize the overall unity of the mosque.
He also speaks of paradisiacal symbolism. Whatever these symbolic meanings may have been in early mosques, they were later lost since they started to become insignificant to the beholders. The reason for the interpretation is obvious when we observe the Mosque of Cordoba (fig. 10). Moreover, the only exception is the Arabic writings on buildings, which are more than just decorations for Islam. Since it does not exist in the early mosques, this is considered as a development of later periods.
            The text had enlightened me about the formation of a mosque and the early Islamic structures. Grabar uses several examples and also points out the exceptions in each case to support his arguments. What I have learned from him is that, although the most of the early Islamic architecture did not have any elements that were new inventions but were adapted from pre-existing forms, it is important to understand that it is impossible to confuse a Muslim mosque with a pre-Islamic structure.


 
Figure 1.a
The Great Mosque of Cordoba


 


 
 
Figure 1.b
Interior of the Great Mosque of Cordoba




 
 
Figure 2
The Great Mosque of Damascus




 
Figure 3
Al-Aqsa Mosque




 
Figure 4
The diagram of the Prophet’s house in Medina


 


 
 
Figure 5
The plan of the Great Mosque of Damascus to point out the perpendicular naves used in the mosques




 
Figure 6
The Great Mosque of Kariouan to show an example for the rectangular minaret type attached to the mosque

 


Figure 7
Minaret of the Great Mosque of Samarra to show an example for the cylindrical separate minaret type



 
Figure 8
The minaret of the Great Mosque of Damascus

 

Figure 9
The mihrab of the Great Mosque of Cordoba

Figure 10
The paradisiacal courtyard of the Great Mosque of Cordoba

WORKS CITED
Grabar, Oleg. "Islamic Religious Art: The Mosque." The Formation of Islamic Art.  New Haven: Yale UP, 1973. N. pag. Print.
Grabar, Oleg. The Formation of Islamic Art. New Haven: Yale UP, 1973. 113. Print.
           
            "Surat Al-Jumu`ah (The Congregation, Friday) - سورة الجمعة." Quran.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Mar. 2014.
            surat no: 62 verse: 9
 
 
Bird's eye view of the Great Mosque of Cordoba. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. (fig. 1.a)
 
The Great Mosque of Cordoba. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. (fig. 1.b)
 
The Great Mosque of Damascus. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. (fig, 2)
 
 
Al-Aqsa Mosque. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. (fig. 3)
 
 
The Diagram of the Prophet’s House in Medina. Digital image.Http://knoji.com/images/user/Slide3(20).jpg. N.p., n.d. Web. (fig. 4)
 
The plan of the Great Mosque of Damascus. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. (fig. 5)
 
Minaret of the Great Mosque of Kariouan. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. (fig. 6)
 
Minaret of the Great Mosque of Samarra. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. (fig. 7)
 
The minaret of the Great Mosque of Damascus. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. (fig. 8)
 
The mihrab of the Great Mosque of Cordoba. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. (fig. 9)
 
The courtyard of the Great Mosque of Cordoba. Digital image. N.p., n.d. Web. (fig. 10)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Hiç yorum yok:

Yorum Gönder